The American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS), the American Historical Association (AHA), and the Modern Language Association (MLA) commend Judge Colleen McMahon’s decision for the Authors Guild, which ensures that funds for terminated National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) grants can not be reallocated while the case is being tried.

The plaintiffs are encouraged that the judge rejected the government’s motion to dismiss their claim that DOGE was responsible for the terminations and their First Amendment claims. They have also filed an appeal to the judge’s dismissal of their request for a preliminary injunction. The ACLS, AHA, and MLA are committed to moving forward with the case and remain steadfast in their efforts to stop the unlawful dismantling of the NEH. 

Established in 1965, the NEH has been a cornerstone investor in the advancement and accessibility of humanities knowledge and programs, providing funding to museums, historic sites, colleges, universities, libraries, public television and radio stations, research institutions, scholars, and programs. Funded programs benefit millions of Americans and local communities in every state.

ACLS, AHA, and MLA filed a lawsuit on May 1, 2025, seeking to reverse the recent actions to devastate the NEH, including the elimination of grant programs, staff, and entire divisions and programs. Following the July 25, 2025, decision, ACLS, AHA, and MLA will continue to press the argument—in court, with Congress, and with the public—that the NEH remains a critical agency for American democracy, history, literature, languages, philosophy, politics, society, and culture.

Over the past 60 years, the NEH has awarded over 70,000 grants to museums, historic sites, colleges, universities, K–12 teaching, libraries, public television and radio stations, research institutions, independent scholars, and to its humanities council affiliates. 

The NEH’s investment in cultural and educational institutions sustains local jobs in the humanities, promotes cultural tourism, and contributes to the creative economy. NEH grants support the building blocks of American civil society, funding projects that examine, preserve, and shape our culture and history. These grants fund excellence in research, education, and humanities experiences for the American people. In times of crisis, the NEH provides relief funding to humanities organizations to safeguard our national heritage.

“Since April, we have seen the devastating impact the cancellation of this funding has made on scholars, students, state humanities councils, and communities around the country,” said ACLS President Joy Connolly. “We remain staunch in our commitment to supporting humanistic scholars and their academic freedom, and we will continue to pursue all legal options available to us, including this latest appeal of the July 25 ruling.”

“The NEH is vital to the American public’s engagement with the vibrant landscape of humanities education and research,” said AHA executive director Sarah Weicksel. “We remain committed to pursuing all legal options to ensure that the work of the NEH and its staff continues to connect Americans with the history and culture that is so central to civic engagement.”

“Since its founding, the NEH has had bipartisan support; legislators have understood that its work benefits all Americans—strengthening our communities, supporting cultural understanding, and promoting an informed democracy,” said MLA executive director Paula M. Krebs. “We will continue to fight for the NEH’s vital work.”

The plaintiffs, represented by the Jacobson Lawyers Group, are associations represented on the National Humanities Alliance executive committee. The Phi Beta Kappa Society is also contributing to this effort.

More information about the lawsuit is available online, including the July 25 decision and declarations by Dr. Connolly, Dr. James Grossman (AHA), and Dr. Krebs.

FAQ

Our lawsuit will move forward in two ways. We will appeal the court’s ruling that we did not have standing to pursue our program-related claims, which challenged the dismantling of NEH funding programs and reduction of NEH staff. We will simultaneously continue with termination-related claims (Counts VIII and IX), which assert that DOGE acted without appropriate authority in terminating awards.

The suit has been filed, and we are not taking additional plaintiffs in the interest of expediency. After an extensive evaluation of potential pathways, we determined this suit is the most expeditious and effective course for reversing the administration’s actions, including the elimination of grant programs, staff, and entire divisions and programs.

The suit aims to restore the NEH’s grant programs, divisions, and staff capacity. It is possible that some or even most grants could be restored as part of the suit.

We determined that bringing this suit in the manner that we have is the most efficient and straightforward way to obtain swift relief on behalf of all of those who benefit from NEH and its programs.

ACLS, AHA, and MLA are organizations represented on the National Humanities Alliance (NHA) executive committee. All three organizations helped to found NHA in 1981 to allow humanities organizations to speak with one voice in support of the National Endowment for the Humanities. As organizations with cancelled grants, ACLS, AHA, and MLA have standing to bring this suit.

The Phi Beta Kappa Society and the National Humanities Alliance have played advisory and coordinating roles in developing the suit.

Drawing on multiple sources, the Association for Computers and the Humanities has created what we believe is the most comprehensive database of cancelled grants.  Access the database.

Yes! We need Congress to reaffirm its support for the NEH and underscore its intent by appropriating funding for it. This form allows you to send messages to your elected officials with the click of a button.

As membership organizations, ACLS, AHA, and MLA can demonstrate standing in the suit by documenting how at least one of their members has been harmed by the NEH’s actions.

Read the Complaint
Learn More